About the work
This is the final, corrected and completed version of a previous dissertation presented in FLUL in 2015 (see http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24156) . The dissertation has as purpose to analyse thematically the 1715/16 controversy between Leibniz and Clarke, not only, as usual, within space and time conceptions' scope, but in the set of his metaphysical, theological, gnosiological and physical thematics. In the dissertation's structuration, it has acquired a central role the authors' confrontation about the liberty's notion, whose importance is evident in the use of the principle of sufficient reason and its corollaries, in the distinction between truths of reason and truths of fact, between necessity's various types, in the space and time's alternative conceptions, in the alternative between atoms and monades, in the universe's limits' problem, in the relation between soul and body, in the theses relative to the divine providence, in the way God's relation with his machine is conceived, in the notion of miracle and even in force and movement notions, at least in what regards its relationship with God, this without neglecting the direct approach to the very notion of liberty. With this framework, it intends to show, through an eloquent historical example, that the natural scientific theories may be founded in metaphysical theories and that these foundations don't have to be exhausted, even within metaphysics, in strictly cosmological questions, this beyond the possibility of never underestimable influences of non-philosophical domains, as is the case of dogmatic theology. Although this is evident in the texts' reading, there is a systematic contemporary lessening of this determination, as if it was an idiosyncrasy of the age or a deference that science had to have in a time still obscured by the authority of the churches and the philosophical speculation. This approach intends to understand all of the thinking's aspects expressed by the authors in the controversy, in its entirety, without reservations of any kind.
Print work information
Work information
Title Liberdade e necessidade - Análise temática da totalidade da correspondência entre Gottfried Leibniz e Samuel Clarke (1715/1716)
This is the final, corrected and completed version of a previous dissertation presented in FLUL in 2015 (see http://hdl.handle.net/10451/24156) . The dissertation has as purpose to analyse thematically the 1715/16 controversy between Leibniz and Clarke, not only, as usual, within space and time conceptions' scope, but in the set of his metaphysical, theological, gnosiological and physical thematics. In the dissertation's structuration, it has acquired a central role the authors' confrontation about the liberty's notion, whose importance is evident in the use of the principle of sufficient reason and its corollaries, in the distinction between truths of reason and truths of fact, between necessity's various types, in the space and time's alternative conceptions, in the alternative between atoms and monades, in the universe's limits' problem, in the relation between soul and body, in the theses relative to the divine providence, in the way God's relation with his machine is conceived, in the notion of miracle and even in force and movement notions, at least in what regards its relationship with God, this without neglecting the direct approach to the very notion of liberty. With this framework, it intends to show, through an eloquent historical example, that the natural scientific theories may be founded in metaphysical theories and that these foundations don't have to be exhausted, even within metaphysics, in strictly cosmological questions, this beyond the possibility of never underestimable influences of non-philosophical domains, as is the case of dogmatic theology. Although this is evident in the texts' reading, there is a systematic contemporary lessening of this determination, as if it was an idiosyncrasy of the age or a deference that science had to have in a time still obscured by the authority of the churches and the philosophical speculation. This approach intends to understand all of the thinking's aspects expressed by the authors in the controversy, in its entirety, without reservations of any kind.
Work type Narrative, Essay
Tags epistemología, necessity, samuel clarke, liberdade, gottfried wilhelm leibniz, isaac newton, metafísica, teologia
-------------------------
Registry info in Safe Creative
Identifier 1808077994807
Entry date Aug 7, 2018, 5:49 PM UTC
License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0
-------------------------
Copyright registered declarations
Author. Holder Joaquim Narciso. Date Aug 7, 2018.
Information available at https://www.safecreative.org/work/1808077994807-liberdade-e-necessidade-analise-tematica-da-totalidade-da-correspondencia-entre-gottfried-leibniz-e-samuel-clarke-1715-1716-
/
Registration: 1808077994807
